Court Wins & Cases

Mr. T was at home near Springfield and Lexington when a Chicago Police Officer chased a person into Mr. T’s home. The person the officer was chasing had not committed a crime but did not want to be questioned on the street by the police. Once in Mr. T’s home, the officer lost the person they were chasing but began searching the home and found a gun and over 600 grams marijuana. At a motion to suppress evidence, Attorney Levinsohn proved that the officer did not have the right to chase this person into Mr. T’s home and start searching. The case was DISMISSED.

Mr. T’s ex-wife lied to police by telling them that he violated an order of protection by coming over to the house were his children lived. Instead of checking the records, the police arrested Mr. T. At court we proved that Mr. T was not guilty of violating the order of protection by visiting his children. But then his ex lied to the court by saying that he pulled her hair so hard that it caused injury to her head. We showed the judge that she lied by having the responding officer testify that she never mentioned any hair pulling at the time of the arrest. The judge found Mr. T Not Guilty.

Mr. B’s ex-girlfriend claimed that he choked her, pulled out her hair, and beat her up. Attorney Levinsohn sent out an investigator to interview family members of the ex who explained how she had lied and put false cases on all of them. We also spoke to Mr. B’s current girlfriend and documented that she and the ex actually got into a fight days before the alleged incident. The pictures that the police took of the ex did not match up to her alleged injuries. After presenting this evidence to the state and the court, the ex-girlfriend did not come to court. The case was Dismissed and a warrant was issued for the ex-girlfriend.

The Chicago Police claimed that Mr. H and another person pistol whipped and robbed a man near 75th and Union. After Mr. H’s previous attorney dragged the case out, Attorney Levinsohn quickly set a trial date. During the trial, we proved to the judge that Mr. H was not one of the perpetrators. That victim gave two descriptions, neither of which matched the physical description of Mr. H. It was proven that there was no physical or forensic evidence linking Mr. H to the crime. Finally, Attorney Levinsohn got the victim to admit on the stand that he had expressed doubt to the prosecutor as to whether Mr. H was the right person. Finding of NOT GUILTY.

Call now for your consultation.

Call Bridgeview aggravated battery defense attorney Mike Levinsohn at 312 919-0200

Retail Theft

Ms. M. was a 18 year high school student who has never been in trouble before. I convinced the state’s attorney to admit her into a special program. Ms. M. completed the program and the case was dismissed

Call now for your consultation.

Call Bridgeview retail theft defense attorney Mike Levinsohn at 312 919-0200