Firm Case Number: 2014-05-1000
Retail Theft
DISMISSED
Bridgeview Courthouse
Retail Theft
Our client was a 18 year high school student who had never been in trouble before. I convinced the state’s attorney to admit her into a special program. She completed the program and the case was dismissed
Call now for your consultation.
Call Bridgeview retail theft defense attorney Mike Levinsohn at 312 919-0200
Firm Case Number: 2013-26-1158
Criminal Sexual Assault
NOT GUILTY
26th & California, Chicago
Mr. S’s 15 year old step daughter accused him of raping her while visiting him in Chicago during Thanksgiving and then again on New Year’s Eve. At trial, Attorney Levinsohn showed that the step-daughter lied to police and then during trial. We presented a previously recorded video statement of the step-daughter and numerous witness who saw Mr. S and the step-daughter during these visits to prove that she lied to court. At the end of the case Mr. S was found NOT GUILTY.
Firm Case Number: 2013-26-1154
Aggravated Assault on a Police Officer
Criminal Damage to Property
NOT GUILTY
26th & California, Chicago
Our client was in a car accident with an off-duty Chicago Police Officer. He fled the scene but was later blocked by the officer as our client tried to drive into an alley. While trying to get into the alley, Mr. T drove toward the officer. The officer shot at our client. At trial we showed that our client did not criminally damage anyone’s car and that the officer lied and did not identify himself as a police officer before shooting at Mr. T. NOT GUILTY of Felony Aggravated Assault and Felony Criminal Damage to Property.
ALL OF THESE RECORDS ARE SEALED FROM THE PUBLIC
Firm Case Number: 2014-26-188
Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon
NOT GUILTY
26th & California, Chicago
Chicago Police Officers went to a store near 62nd Street and Damen and arrested Mr. W. They claimed he was in the store and illegally had a gun in his pants. At trial we showed that Mr. W. was the armed security guard for the store with the gun properly holstered and that he had the proper documentation to be a security guard. Finding of NOT GUILTY.