Court Wins & Cases

Search by

People v. Confidential 1090

Firm Case Number: 2010-48-1090
Delivery of a Controlled Substance
NO PROBABLE CAUSE
51st & Wentworth

At a preliminary hearing, Chicago police claim that Mr. N was selling drugs to people. When he was arrested, Mr. N had no drugs on him and only $12. We showed the court that there was not enough evidence – no probable cause.
51st & Wentworth

Case Number: 2010-48-1090
Type:
Court Decision:
Contact Michael J. Levinsohn Now

People v. Confidential 1087

Firm Case Number: 2010-DB-1087
Domestic Battery
DISMISSED
Chicago Domestic Violence Court

Our client’s ex-girl friend claimed that he grabbed her by the arms and neck and dragged her down the stairs. We set the case for trial. The state was unable to produce any photographs or medical records to document the injuries. Dismissed.

Case Number: 2010-DB-1087
Type:
Court Decision:
Contact Michael J. Levinsohn Now

People v. Confidential 1085

Firm Case Number: 2010-26-1085
Possession of a Controlled Substance
NO PROBABLE CAUSE
26th & California, Chicago

Chicago police claimed that Mr. T was yelling “yo, yo, rocks” and that he ran when the police came. When they caught him they claimed to have found drugs. Finding of NO PROBABLE CAUSE.

Case Number: 2010-26-1085
Type:
Court Decision:
Contact Michael J. Levinsohn Now

People v. Confidential 1075

Firm Case Number: 2010-DB-1075
Domestic Battery
DISMISSED
Chicago Domestic Violence Court

Ms. S was accused of hitting her daughter-in-law in the face. We set the case for trial. We showed that the state didn’t have any medical records or other evidence to prove that a battery had actually occurred. Case dismissed.

Case Number: 2010-DB-1075
Type:
Court Decision:
Contact Michael J. Levinsohn Now

People v. Confidential 1071

Firm Case Number: 2010-26-1071
Burglary and Theft
NOT GUILTY of FELONY
26th & California, Chicago

Mr. I was accused of stealing computers and drapes from the Chicago Cultural Center. By using the security video, we showed that most of the state’s witnesses had lied. Mr. I was found not guilty of taking the computers but guilty of a misdemeanor because he took the drapes. finding of not guilty of the felony.

Case Number: 2010-26-1071
Type:
Court Decision:
Contact Michael J. Levinsohn Now